MAJALAH The Economis menulis bahawa ‘bintang’ Anwar semakin pudar setelah peranannya sebagai pencetus keganasan dalam BERSIH 3.0 dipersoal. Majalah itu juga menyatakan bahawa Anwar perlu membuat penjelasan mengenai isyarat tangannya yang diterjemah sebagai arahan untuk merempuh halangan polis.
Malah dalam sidang media PKR kemudiannya, Anwar juga dituduh sebagai membahayakan nyawa peserta sekali gus memperjudikan matlamat BERSIH.
Lalu, The Economist juga mempersoalkan apakah seorang yang sanggup mengambil-alih sebuah perhimpunan aman untuk ditukar menjadi perhimpunan ganas wajar diangkat menjadi pemimpin kepada 28 juta rakyat?
Artikel negatif mengenai Anwar yang disiarkan oleh media barat bolehlah dianggap sebagai luar-biasa kerana selama ini majoriti mereka termasuk Jurusalem Post juga sering memuji-mujinya hatta menobatkannya sebagai satu-satunya pemimpin Islam yang layak memimpin bukan saja Malaysia, tetapi Asia Tenggara.
Pastinya, kegagalan BERSIH 3.0 adalah terlalu ketara dan tidak dapat dimanipulasi lagi sehingga menyebabkan media barat juga terpaksa mengakuinya.
Atas hakikat ini, maka laungan pemimpin-pemimpin pembangkang yang tegar menyatakan ia berjaya bolehlah dianggap sebagai menipu diri sendiri dan penyokong mereka.
Kita tahu, mereka malu dan sebagai politikus yang ego, takbur dan riak belaka, mereka tidak mampu menerima kekalahan dengan baik. Kerana itu, mereka melaungkan BERSIH 4.0 sekadar untuk menutup malu.
Pokoknya di sini, para pemimpin pembangkang langsung tidak kisah merisikokan nyawa dan nasib penyokong mereka sekali lagi dan mungkin berkali-kali lagi selepas ini. Dan semua ini dilakukan semata-mata untuk menutup malu!
Kita tidak tahu berapa ramai pula peserta yang sanggup suka-suka menghulurkan tubuh badannya untuk cedera dan menggadaikan masa depan serta menyusahkan keluarga dalam BERSIH 4.0 jika benar ia bakal diadakan. Sedangkan pada hakikatnya mereka sedang menikmati hidup senang lenang dan aman tenteram tanpa apa-apa ancaman.
STUDENT@MALAYSIA-STUDENT.com (BERSIH MALAYSIA)
ReplyDeleteMCA (DATUK YIP KUM FOOK, MCA CHAIRMAN GOMBAK) INSULTED BUDDHIST MONKS
Dear Devotees into the Dhamma,
I sincerely shall use the language to make publicly the bitter experience that actually has happened in the SAMNAK SAMBODHI BUDDHIST ASSOCIATION NO: 19-21 JALAN 38 TAMAN DESA JAYA KEPONG 52100 KUALA LUMPUR, MALAYSIA.
I am not satisfied with the Gombak MCA Division chairman (Yip Kum Fook) and the SAMNAK SAMBODHI BUDDHIST ASSSOCIATION chairman (Yip Kum Fook) because he used vicious and arrogant means in bringing in a group of individuals from other places to provoke and trample the sacred ground and without any sound reason called in the police to forcefully detain the monk so as to humiliate worshippers of Buddhism.
I strongly would like to ask here that what great sin and crimes had he committed to the extent of you Yip Kum Fook lawyer by means or by crooks called in the police to detain a monk like him?
I came from Penang, I was a newcomer and I temporarily put up at the SAMNAK SAMBODHI BUDDHIST ASSOCIATION to study and learn to practice Buddhism. While at the temple, I could not bear with the way Yip Kum Fook lawyer behaved, your uncourteous, arrogant and unexcelled attitude in treating the Temple abbot.
Because I said a few words about your behavior to you Yip Kum Fook, you resorted to such dirty means to hurt a monk. It is indeed unacceptable and cast a very bad example.
For a school principal, if his and her student has committed an offence, the police must as a matter of courtesy meet up with the principal, try to understand the actual situation, before the police take any actions. This is the usual practice.
But it is sorry to say, that Yip kum Fook lawyer who himself is a lawyer chose to have done. Otherwise, he did not act in accordance with the teaching of Buddhism and looked down on the spirit of Buddhism for the sole purpose of showing off that he is the powerful chairman of MCA Gombak Division and the chairman of the SAMNAK SAMBODHI BUDDHIST ASSOCIATION. He demanded the police to detain the monk so as to realize his motive.
It is very fortunate that due to the fact that religion itself is a sensitive matter, even the Malay policemen understood and respected the religion, culture and customs of other communities, so they did not rush into taking any actions. Otherwise, the consequences would be catastrophic.
I understand why Yip Kum Fook lawyer was furious and flared up. The main reason is as follows. The abbot of the SAMNAK SAMBODHI BUDDHIST ASSOCIATION. He has been the abbot for 20 years. He was the architect and played the pivotal in raising fund the public to build up the Temple.
Continued next………